Skip to main content

Public reports › School districts · Colorado

School district · Colorado · 2,004 students

Eaton RE-2

eaton.k12.co.us · homepage scanned Oct 16, 2026 · WCAG 2.2 A/AA automated check

F

Accessibility score

52/100 · Failing

The homepage has critical barriers: content screen readers cannot describe, controls keyboards cannot reach, or text that cannot be read at normal contrast. This is the profile that draws complaints.

2

Critical

4

Major

0

Minor

Screenshot of the Eaton RE-2 homepage at scan time

Homepage as loaded by our crawler on Oct 16, 2026.

In plain English

What this means for visitors

The scan found issues that may cause problems for visitors with disabilities, such as screen reader users who can't understand buttons or links, or keyboard-only users who can't navigate. To improve accessibility, start by fixing critical issues like invalid ARIA attributes and buttons without accessible names. Automated scans like this one catch many problems, but not all, so further review is needed to ensure the site is usable for everyone.

Findings

6 issue types found on the homepage

Each item is one failing rule; the count shows how many elements on the page trigger it. Severity follows axe-core impact levels.

#1CriticalWCAG 4.1.21 elementRule details ↗

Invalid ARIA attributes

ARIA attributes are used where they aren't allowed, which can make screen readers announce wrong information.

Who it affects

Blocks a task outright for some visitors (for example an image-only flyer with no text, or a form field with no label).

First fix

Remove or correct the attribute; often caused by a plugin or theme.

#2CriticalWCAG 4.1.21 elementRule details ↗

Buttons have no accessible name

Icon-only buttons (search, menu, close) are announced as 'button' with no purpose.

Who it affects

Blocks a task outright for some visitors (for example an image-only flyer with no text, or a form field with no label).

First fix

Add an aria-label to icon buttons (for example aria-label="Open menu").

#3MajorWCAG 2.4.43 elementsRule details ↗

Links have no readable text

Screen readers announce these links as just 'link', so people can't tell where they go. Common with icon-only links and 'read more' buttons.

Who it affects

Makes a task significantly harder (low contrast, links with no name, missing frame titles).

First fix

Give every link visible text, or add an aria-label describing the destination.

#4MajorWCAG 4.1.21 elementRule details ↗

Embedded frames have no title

Embedded maps, calendars and videos are announced as 'frame' with no description.

Who it affects

Makes a task significantly harder (low contrast, links with no name, missing frame titles).

First fix

Add a title attribute to each <iframe> (for example title="Google Map of the district office").

#5MajorWCAG 1.3.11 elementRule details ↗

Lists are built incorrectly

List structure is broken, so screen readers can't announce 'list of 5 items'.

Who it affects

Makes a task significantly harder (low contrast, links with no name, missing frame titles).

First fix

Only put <li> inside <ul>/<ol>; remove stray elements injected by the editor.

#6MajorWCAG 2.5.81 elementRule details ↗

Touch targets are too small

Small links and buttons are hard to tap for people with motor impairments.

Who it affects

Makes a task significantly harder (low contrast, links with no name, missing frame titles).

First fix

Make clickable targets at least 24×24 CSS pixels or add spacing.

Severity guide

How to read the counts

Critical

Blocks a task outright for some visitors (for example an image-only flyer with no text, or a form field with no label).

Major

Makes a task significantly harder (low contrast, links with no name, missing frame titles).

Minor

Reduces clarity or consistency (heading order, landmarks, touch-target size).

What this grade does and does not cover

  • Covers: the public homepage only, loaded once in a desktop browser, tested with axe-core against WCAG 2.2 Level A and AA rules (a superset of the WCAG 2.1 AA standard in the DOJ rule).
  • Does not cover: inner pages, PDFs and documents, logged-in portals, video captions, alt-text quality, keyboard usability of custom widgets, or anything that needs a human judgment.
  • A grade is a monitoring signal, not a legal assessment or certification. How we score.